> dependency-injection-patterns
Organize DI registrations using IServiceCollection extension methods. Group related services into composable Add* methods for clean Program.cs and reusable configuration in tests.
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/microsoft-extensions-dependency-injection?format=md"Dependency Injection Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Organizing service registrations in ASP.NET Core applications
- Avoiding massive Program.cs/Startup.cs files with hundreds of registrations
- Making service configuration reusable between production and tests
- Designing libraries that integrate with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection
Reference Files
- advanced-patterns.md: Testing with DI extensions, Akka.NET actor scope management, conditional/factory/keyed registration patterns
The Problem
Without organization, Program.cs becomes unmanageable:
// BAD: 200+ lines of unorganized registrations
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
builder.Services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
// ... 150 more lines ...
Problems: hard to find related registrations, no clear boundaries, can't reuse in tests, merge conflicts.
The Solution: Extension Method Composition
Group related registrations into extension methods:
// GOOD: Clean, composable Program.cs
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddEmailServices()
.AddPaymentServices()
.AddValidators();
var app = builder.Build();
Extension Method Pattern
Basic Structure
namespace MyApp.Users;
public static class UserServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddUserServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IUserReadStore, UserReadStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserWriteStore, UserWriteStore>();
services.AddScoped<IUserService, UserService>();
services.AddScoped<IUserValidationService, UserValidationService>();
return services;
}
}
With Configuration
namespace MyApp.Email;
public static class EmailServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddEmailServices(
this IServiceCollection services,
string configSectionName = "EmailSettings")
{
services.AddOptions<EmailOptions>()
.BindConfiguration(configSectionName)
.ValidateDataAnnotations()
.ValidateOnStart();
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
services.AddSingleton<IEmailLinkGenerator, EmailLinkGenerator>();
services.AddScoped<IUserEmailComposer, UserEmailComposer>();
services.AddScoped<IEmailSender, SmtpEmailSender>();
return services;
}
}
File Organization
Place extension methods near the services they register:
src/
MyApp.Api/
Program.cs # Composes all Add* methods
MyApp.Users/
Services/
UserService.cs
UserServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddUserServices()
MyApp.Orders/
OrderServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddOrderServices()
MyApp.Email/
EmailServiceCollectionExtensions.cs # AddEmailServices()
Convention: {Feature}ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs next to the feature's services.
Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Use For |
|---|---|
Add{Feature}Services() | General feature registration |
Add{Feature}() | Short form when unambiguous |
Configure{Feature}() | When primarily setting options |
Use{Feature}() | Middleware (on IApplicationBuilder) |
Testing Benefits
The Add* pattern lets you reuse production configuration in tests and only override what's different. Works with WebApplicationFactory, Akka.Hosting.TestKit, and standalone ServiceCollection.
See advanced-patterns.md for complete testing examples.
Layered Extensions
For larger applications, compose extensions hierarchically:
public static class AppServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddAppServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddDomainServices()
.AddInfrastructureServices()
.AddApiServices();
}
}
public static class DomainServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddDomainServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
return services
.AddUserServices()
.AddOrderServices()
.AddProductServices();
}
}
Akka.Hosting Integration
The same pattern works for Akka.NET actor configuration:
public static class OrderActorExtensions
{
public static AkkaConfigurationBuilder AddOrderActors(
this AkkaConfigurationBuilder builder)
{
return builder
.WithActors((system, registry, resolver) =>
{
var orderProps = resolver.Props<OrderActor>();
var orderRef = system.ActorOf(orderProps, "orders");
registry.Register<OrderActor>(orderRef);
});
}
}
// Usage in Program.cs
builder.Services.AddAkka("MySystem", (builder, sp) =>
{
builder
.AddOrderActors()
.AddInventoryActors()
.AddNotificationActors();
});
See akka-hosting-actor-patterns skill for complete Akka.Hosting patterns.
Anti-Patterns
Don't: Register Everything in Program.cs
// BAD: Massive Program.cs with 200+ lines of registrations
Don't: Create Overly Generic Extensions
// BAD: Too vague, doesn't communicate what's registered
public static IServiceCollection AddServices(this IServiceCollection services) { ... }
Don't: Hide Important Configuration
// BAD: Buried settings
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer("hardcoded-connection-string")); // Hidden!
}
// GOOD: Accept configuration explicitly
public static IServiceCollection AddDatabase(
this IServiceCollection services,
string connectionString)
{
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
}
Best Practices Summary
| Practice | Benefit |
|---|---|
Group related services into Add* methods | Clean Program.cs, clear boundaries |
| Place extensions near the services they register | Easy to find and maintain |
Return IServiceCollection for chaining | Fluent API |
| Accept configuration parameters | Flexibility |
Use consistent naming (Add{Feature}Services) | Discoverability |
| Test by reusing production extensions | Confidence, less duplication |
Lifetime Management
| Lifetime | Use When | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Singleton | Stateless, thread-safe, expensive to create | Configuration, HttpClient factories, caches |
| Scoped | Stateful per-request, database contexts | DbContext, repositories, user context |
| Transient | Lightweight, stateful, cheap to create | Validators, short-lived helpers |
// SINGLETON: Stateless services, shared safely
services.AddSingleton<IMjmlTemplateRenderer, MjmlTemplateRenderer>();
// SCOPED: Database access, per-request state
services.AddScoped<IUserRepository, UserRepository>();
// TRANSIENT: Cheap, short-lived
services.AddTransient<CreateUserRequestValidator>();
Scoped services require a scope. ASP.NET Core creates one per HTTP request. In background services and actors, create scopes manually.
See advanced-patterns.md for actor scope management patterns.
Common Mistakes
Injecting Scoped into Singleton
// BAD: Singleton captures scoped service - stale DbContext!
public class CacheService // Registered as Singleton
{
private readonly IUserRepository _repo; // Scoped - captured at startup!
}
// GOOD: Inject IServiceProvider, create scope per operation
public class CacheService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
public async Task<User> GetUserAsync(string id)
{
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var repo = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IUserRepository>();
return await repo.GetByIdAsync(id);
}
}
No Scope in Background Work
// BAD: No scope for scoped services
public class BadBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IOrderService _orderService; // Scoped - will throw!
}
// GOOD: Create scope for each unit of work
public class GoodBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory;
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken ct)
{
using var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope();
var orderService = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IOrderService>();
// ...
}
}
Resources
- Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/extensions/dependency-injection
- Akka.Hosting: https://github.com/akkadotnet/Akka.Hosting
- Akka.DependencyInjection: https://getakka.net/articles/actors/dependency-injection.html
- Options Pattern: See
microsoft-extensions-configurationskill
> related_skills --same-repo
> verify-email-snapshots
Snapshot test email templates using Verify to catch regressions. Validates rendered HTML output matches approved baseline. Works with MJML templates and any email renderer.
> testcontainers-integration-tests
Write integration tests using TestContainers for .NET with xUnit. Covers infrastructure testing with real databases, message queues, and caches in Docker containers instead of mocks.
> snapshot-testing
Use Verify for snapshot testing in .NET. Approve API surfaces, HTTP responses, rendered emails, and serialized outputs. Detect unintended changes through human-reviewed baseline files.
> dotnet-slopwatch
Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modification to catch disabled tests, suppressed warnings, empty catch blocks, and other shortcuts that mask real problems.