> fpf:decay
Manage evidence freshness by identifying stale decisions and providing governance actions
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit/decay?format=md"Evidence Freshness Management
Manages evidence freshness by identifying stale decisions and providing governance actions. Implements FPF B.3.4 (Evidence Decay).
Key principle: Evidence is perishable. Decisions built on expired evidence carry hidden risk.
Quick Concepts
What is "stale" evidence?
Every piece of evidence has a valid_until date. A benchmark from 6 months ago may no longer reflect current system performance. A security audit from before a major dependency update doesn't account for new vulnerabilities.
When evidence expires, the decision it supports becomes questionable - not necessarily wrong, just unverified.
What is "waiving"?
Waiving = "I know this evidence is stale, I accept the risk temporarily."
Use it when:
- You're about to launch and don't have time to re-run all tests
- The evidence is only slightly expired and probably still valid
- You have a scheduled date to refresh it properly
A waiver is NOT ignoring the problem - it's explicitly documenting that you know about the risk and accept it until a specific date.
The Three Actions
| Situation | Action | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence is old but decision is still good | Refresh | Re-run the test, get fresh evidence |
| Decision is obsolete, needs rethinking | Deprecate | Downgrade hypothesis, restart evaluation |
| Accept risk temporarily | Waive | Record the risk acceptance with deadline |
Action (Run-Time)
Step 1: Generate Freshness Report
- List all evidence files in
.fpf/evidence/ - For each evidence file:
- Read
valid_untilfrom frontmatter - Compare with current date
- Classify as FRESH, STALE, or EXPIRED
- Read
Step 2: Present Report
## Evidence Freshness Report
### EXPIRED (Requires Action)
| Evidence | Hypothesis | Expired | Days Overdue |
|----------|------------|---------|--------------|
| ev-benchmark-2024-06-15 | redis-caching | 2024-12-15 | 45 |
| ev-security-2024-07-01 | auth-module | 2025-01-01 | 14 |
### STALE (Warning)
| Evidence | Hypothesis | Expires | Days Left |
|----------|------------|---------|-----------|
| ev-loadtest-2024-10-01 | api-gateway | 2025-01-20 | 5 |
### FRESH
| Evidence | Hypothesis | Expires |
|----------|------------|---------|
| ev-unittest-2025-01-10 | validation-lib | 2025-07-10 |
### WAIVED
| Evidence | Waived Until | Rationale |
|----------|--------------|-----------|
| ev-perf-old | 2025-02-01 | Migration pending |
Step 3: Handle User Actions
Based on user response, perform one of:
Refresh
User: "Refresh the redis caching evidence"
- Navigate to the hypothesis in
.fpf/knowledge/L2/ - Re-run validation to create fresh evidence
Deprecate
User: "Deprecate the auth module decision"
- Move hypothesis from L2 to L1 (or L1 to L0)
- Create deprecation record:
# In .fpf/evidence/deprecate-auth-module-2025-01-15.md
---
id: deprecate-auth-module-2025-01-15
hypothesis_id: auth-module
action: deprecate
from_layer: L2
to_layer: L1
created: 2025-01-15T10:00:00Z
---
# Deprecation: auth-module
**Reason**: Evidence expired, technology landscape changed
**Next Steps**: Run `/fpf:propose-hypotheses` to explore alternatives
- Move the hypothesis file:
mv .fpf/knowledge/L2/auth-module.md .fpf/knowledge/L1/auth-module.md
Waive
User: "Waive the benchmark until February"
- Create waiver record:
# In .fpf/evidence/waiver-benchmark-2025-01-15.md
---
id: waiver-benchmark-2025-01-15
evidence_id: ev-benchmark-2024-06-15
waived_until: 2025-02-01
created: 2025-01-15T10:00:00Z
---
# Waiver: ev-benchmark-2024-06-15
**Evidence**: ev-benchmark-2024-06-15
**Hypothesis**: redis-caching
**Waived Until**: 2025-02-01
**Rationale**: Migration pending, will re-run after completion
**Accepted By**: User
**Created**: 2025-01-15
**WARNING**: This evidence returns to EXPIRED status after 2025-02-01.
Natural Language Usage
You don't need to memorize evidence IDs. Just describe what you want.
Example Workflow
User: /fpf:decay
Agent shows report with stale evidence
User: Waive the benchmark until February, we'll re-run it after the migration.
Agent: Creating waiver for ev-benchmark-2024-06-15 until 2025-02-01.
Rationale: "Re-run after migration"
[Creates .fpf/evidence/waiver-benchmark-2025-01-15.md]
User: The vendor API is being discontinued. Deprecate that decision.
Agent: Deprecating hypothesis-vendor-api from L2 to L1.
[Moves file, creates deprecation record]
Next step: Run /fpf:propose-hypotheses to explore alternatives.
WLNK Principle
A hypothesis is STALE if any of its evidence is expired (and not waived).
This is the Weakest Link (WLNK) principle: reliability = min(all evidence). One stale piece makes the whole decision questionable.
Audit Trail
All actions are logged:
| Action | What's Recorded |
|---|---|
| Deprecate | from_layer, to_layer, reason, date |
| Waive | evidence_id, until_date, rationale, date |
Files created in .fpf/evidence/:
deprecate-{hypothesis}-{date}.mdwaiver-{evidence}-{date}.md
Common Workflows
Weekly Maintenance
/fpf:decay # See what's stale
# For each stale item: refresh, deprecate, or waive
Pre-Release
/fpf:decay # Check for stale decisions
# Either refresh evidence or explicitly waive with documented rationale
# Waiver rationales become part of release documentation
After Major Change
# Dependency update, API change, security advisory...
/fpf:decay # See what's affected
# Deprecate obsolete decisions
# Start new hypothesis cycle for replacements
> related_skills --same-repo
> tech-stack:add-typescript-best-practices
Setup TypeScript best practices and code style rules in CLAUDE.md
> tdd:write-tests
Systematically add test coverage for all local code changes using specialized review and development agents. Add tests for uncommitted changes (including untracked files), or if everything is commited, then will cover latest commit.
> tdd:test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass; ensures tests actually verify behavior by requiring failure first
> tdd:fix-tests
Systematically fix all failing tests after business logic changes or refactoring