ABM Program Orchestrator

A sequential, closed-loop system for running account-based marketing in B2B SaaS. Each phase produces a defined output that feeds the next. Run all 8 phases for a full program build, or invoke any phase individually when you need just one piece.

Why This Skill Exists

Most ABM programs fail for three reasons:

1. They're built as campaigns, not systems. A "target account list" email blast is not ABM. ABM is a coordinated motion across marketing, BDR, and sales that treats accounts as markets of one.

2. They skip the economics. If your ABM cost per SQO is $3,667 but the ACV justifies it at $20K with 3-month payback, the program works. Most teams never run this math. They either overspend on low-ACV accounts or underspend on high-value targets.

3. There's no feedback loop. Campaign ends, team moves on, learnings evaporate. The next ABM cohort starts from scratch instead of building on what the last one taught you.

This skill fixes all three by encoding ABM as a sequential pipeline with a closed loop. Phase 8 feeds learnings back into Phase 1. Each cohort makes the next smarter.

When to Use This Skill

• Designing an ABM program from scratch
• Building or refining a target account list
• Setting up account tiering criteria and methodology
• Planning multi-channel orchestration for target accounts
• Coordinating BDR outreach with marketing air cover
• Defining ABM-specific measurement and attribution frameworks
• Running a quarterly ABM program review
• Making a budget case for ABM investment to leadership
• Comparing ABM economics against demand gen efficiency
• Designing account progression plays (awareness to opportunity)

When NOT to Use This Skill

• Broad demand gen campaign planning (ABM is targeted, not broad)
• Lead scoring or MQL definitions (use your MAP's scoring model)
• Single-channel campaign execution (ABM is multi-channel by definition)
• SMB/PLG motions where 1:1 account targeting doesn't justify the CAC
• Content creation for ABM campaigns (this skill designs the program, not the assets)
• CRM or MAP technical configuration (this is strategic, not implementation)

---

The ABM Pipeline: 8 Sequential Phases

Each phase produces a defined output. That output becomes the input for the next phase. Skip a phase and the downstream work breaks.

PHASE 1              PHASE 2              PHASE 3              PHASE 4
ICP & Economics  →   Account Selection →  Account Tiering  →  Buying Committee
                                                               Mapping

     ↓                                                              ↓

PHASE 8              PHASE 7              PHASE 6              PHASE 5
Program Review   ←   Measurement &    ←   BDR Coordination ←  Channel
& Feedback           Attribution                               Orchestration

     ↓
     └──→ PHASE 1 (next cohort)

The closed loop: Phase 8 produces a learnings document that updates Phase 1 inputs. Account selection criteria sharpen. Tiering weights adjust. Channel mix shifts. Each cohort inherits what the last one learned.

---

Phase 1: ICP Definition & ABM Economics

Input: Company strategy, segment definitions, current pipeline data Output: ABM ICP document + economic viability model

Before selecting a single account, prove the economics work.

ABM Economic Viability Test

Run this before investing anything. If the math doesn't work at the unit level, no amount of orchestration will save the program.

ABM ECONOMIC MODEL

Target segment ACV:          $________
Expected win rate (ABM):     ________%
Gross margin:                ________%
Average sales cycle:         ________ months
Planned ABM spend/quarter:   $________
Expected SQOs from ABM:      ________

DERIVED METRICS
Cost per SQO:                $________ (spend / SQOs)
Expected revenue per SQO:    $________ (ACV × win rate)
CAC payback period:          ________ months (cost per SQO / (ACV × margin / 12))
Pipeline-to-spend ratio:     ________:1 ((SQOs × ACV) / spend)

VIABILITY CHECK
□ CAC payback < 12 months?
□ Pipeline-to-spend ratio > 3:1?
□ Cost per SQO justified by ACV? (rule of thumb: cost per SQO < 20% of ACV)
□ Win rate assumption based on data, not aspiration?

ICP for ABM (Not the Same as Your Demand Gen ICP)

Your demand gen ICP answers "who might buy." Your ABM ICP answers "who should we invest disproportionately in acquiring." The ABM ICP is narrower and more specific.

ABM ICP Dimension	What to Define	Example
Company size	Employee range AND revenue range	100-500 employees, $10M-$100M revenue
Industry vertical	Primary + secondary verticals	SaaS, FinTech (primary); HealthTech (secondary)
Compliance pressure	Regulatory triggers that create urgency	SOC 2 audit upcoming, ISO 27001 required by enterprise customers
Technology signals	Stack indicators that show fit	Uses AWS/Azure/GCP, has a security team, runs CI/CD pipelines
Buying triggers	Events that create a buying window	New CISO hire, funding round, enterprise customer acquisition, compliance deadline
Firmographic fit	Revenue, headcount, geo, funding stage	Series B+, US/UK/ANZ HQ, 3+ person security/compliance function
Negative signals	Disqualifiers that waste ABM spend	Already using a competitor, <50 employees, no compliance requirement

Output format: A 1-page ABM ICP document that any team member (marketing, BDR, sales) can use to evaluate whether an account belongs in the ABM program. If the ICP requires a paragraph of caveats to explain, it's too loose.

---

Phase 2: Account Selection

Input: ABM ICP document (Phase 1) Output: Raw target account list (50-200 accounts per cohort)

Account Sourcing Channels

Don't build your list from a single source. Cross-reference at least 3 to reduce noise.

Source	What It Gives You	Watch Out For
CRM historical data	Accounts that engaged but didn't close (recycled pipeline)	Stale data. Validate that the account still fits the ICP.
Intent data platforms (Bombora, G2, TrustRadius)	Accounts actively researching your category	High false positive rate. Cross-reference with firmographic fit.
Sales input	Accounts sales has identified but hasn't cracked	Sales bias toward big logos that may not fit ICP. Validate against criteria.
Competitor displacement	Accounts using a competitor whose contract is up for renewal	Hard to get accurate data. Best sourced from G2 reviews + sales intel.
Expansion signals	Existing customers with upsell/cross-sell potential	Different motion. Don't mix acquisition ABM with expansion ABM in the same cohort.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator	Filtered by company size, industry, growth signals	Good for enrichment, weak as a primary sourcing channel.
Industry events and communities	Accounts attending relevant conferences, active in Slack groups	Low volume but high signal. Good for Tier 1 enrichment.

Account Qualification Scorecard

Score every account before adding it to the list. This prevents the "big logo bias" where accounts are selected because they'd look good on the website, not because they'd actually buy.

Criterion	Weight	Score (1-5)	Notes
ICP firmographic fit	25%		Company size, industry, geo, funding
Buying trigger present	25%		Active compliance need, recent hire, funding event
Intent signals	20%		Category research, competitor evaluation, content engagement
Sales alignment	15%		Sales agrees this is a viable target and will work it
Competitive displacement opportunity	15%		Using a competitor, contract renewal timing known
TOTAL	100%		Minimum threshold: 3.0 to enter ABM list

Accounts scoring below 3.0 go into demand gen nurture, not ABM. ABM spend on low-fit accounts is the single most common budget waste.

---

Phase 3: Account Tiering

Input: Qualified account list (Phase 2) Output: Tiered account list with resource allocation per tier

The Three-Tier Model

Tier	# of Accounts	Resource Level	Motion Type	Typical Spend/Account/Quarter
Tier 1	10-25	High touch, 1:1	Personalized outreach, custom content, executive engagement, direct mail	$500-$2,000
Tier 2	25-75	Medium touch, 1:few	Industry/persona-specific campaigns, targeted ads, BDR sequences	$100-$500
Tier 3	75-200	Programmatic, 1:many	Targeted ads, automated nurture, intent-triggered BDR outreach	$25-$100

Tiering Decision Matrix

Tier assignment is not just about account size. It's about investment justification.

TIERING LOGIC

Tier 1 IF:
  - ACV potential > 2× your average deal size
  - Active buying trigger confirmed
  - Sales has a named champion or entry point
  - Account is in your top vertical(s)

Tier 2 IF:
  - ACV potential > 1.5× your average deal size
  - Firmographic fit is strong but buying trigger is unconfirmed
  - No sales relationship yet but ICP fit is clear
  - Intent data shows category research

Tier 3 IF:
  - Meets ICP criteria but no active buying trigger
  - ACV potential is at or slightly above average
  - Good long-term fit but not ready for high-touch investment
  - Use as a "warming" tier to monitor for trigger events

Tier Promotion and Demotion Rules

Accounts don't stay in their tier forever. Define rules for movement.

Movement	Trigger	Action
Tier 3 → Tier 2	Intent spike, engagement with 3+ assets, BDR confirms interest	Increase ad spend, add to BDR active sequence, create persona-specific content
Tier 2 → Tier 1	Meeting booked, champion identified, buying timeline confirmed	Assign dedicated BDR, create custom content, activate executive engagement
Tier 1 → Tier 2	No engagement after 60 days of high-touch outreach	Reduce to medium-touch, reallocate budget to responsive Tier 1 accounts
Any tier → Remove	Company acquired, went bankrupt, confirmed competitor lock-in, ICP no longer fits	Remove from ABM list, document reason, update ICP criteria if pattern emerges

---

Phase 4: Buying Committee Mapping

Input: Tiered account list (Phase 3) Output: Persona map per Tier 1 account, persona templates per Tier 2/3

The Buying Committee for B2B SaaS (Compliance/Security Context)

In B2B SaaS selling to mid-market and enterprise, you rarely sell to one person. Map the committee before designing outreach.

Role	Title Examples	What They Care About	Content That Works
Economic Buyer	CFO, VP Finance, CEO	ROI, payback period, total cost vs. build-vs-buy	Business cases, ROI calculators, customer case studies with revenue impact
Technical Evaluator	CTO, VP Engineering, Security Engineer	Integration, architecture, technical capabilities	Technical docs, API documentation, architecture diagrams, POC/sandbox
Compliance Champion	CISO, Head of Compliance, GRC Manager	Audit readiness, framework coverage, evidence collection	Framework coverage matrices, audit prep guides, compliance workflow demos
Day-to-Day User	Compliance Analyst, Security Analyst, IT Manager	Ease of use, time savings, workflow fit	Product tours, onboarding demos, user testimonials, time-saved metrics
Blocker/Gatekeeper	Legal, Procurement, IT Security	Vendor risk, data handling, contract terms	Security questionnaire responses, SOC 2 report, privacy documentation

Mapping Depth by Tier

Tier	Mapping Depth	What You Need
Tier 1	Full committee mapped by name. 3-5 contacts identified with LinkedIn profiles, roles, and preferred channels.	BDR research + LinkedIn Sales Navigator + CRM data + any existing contacts
Tier 2	Persona-level mapping. You know the roles that matter but may not have specific names for all of them.	Template-based. Map the 2-3 most important personas per account.
Tier 3	ICP-level targeting only. You target by title/role across the tier, not by individual.	Programmatic. Use LinkedIn/ad targeting by job title within the account list.

---

Phase 5: Channel Orchestration

Input: Tiered accounts with buying committee maps (Phase 3 + Phase 4) Output: Channel plan per tier with sequencing and budget allocation

Channel Selection by Tier

The right channel mix depends on the tier. Higher tiers justify more expensive, higher-touch channels.

Channel	Tier 1	Tier 2	Tier 3	Cost Level	Notes
LinkedIn Ads (Matched Audiences)	✓	✓	✓	Medium	Foundation for all tiers. Upload account lists for targeting.
Programmatic Display (IP targeting)	✓	✓	✓	Low-Medium	Awareness layer. Cheap impressions on target accounts.
Personalized BDR outreach	✓	✓ (templated)	✗	High (time)	Tier 1: fully custom. Tier 2: persona-templated.
Custom content/landing pages	✓	✗	✗	High	Only for Tier 1. Industry or account-specific content.
Direct mail / gifting	✓	✗	✗	High	Pattern interrupt for Tier 1 accounts that aren't responding to digital.
Executive engagement	✓	✗	✗	Very High (time)	Your CEO/CRO reaches out to their CEO/CISO. Reserve for top 5-10 accounts.
Webinars / events (targeted invites)	✓	✓	✗	Medium	Invite Tier 1-2 contacts to relevant sessions. Personalize the invite.
Retargeting (website visitors)	✓	✓	✓	Low	If the account visits your site, retarget aggressively with relevant content.
Email nurture (automated)	✗	✓	✓	Low	Tier 2-3 only. Tier 1 should get human outreach, not automated email.
Content syndication (targeted)	✗	✓	✓	Medium	Lead gen for Tier 2-3. Validate leads against account list before accepting.

Orchestration Sequencing

ABM channels work in a sequence, not in parallel. Layer them intentionally.

WEEK 1-2: AWARENESS LAYER
├─ LinkedIn Matched Audience ads live (all tiers)
├─ Programmatic display live (all tiers)
└─ Output: Establish brand familiarity before any outreach

WEEK 3-4: WARM-UP
├─ BDR connection requests on LinkedIn (Tier 1-2)
├─ Content engagement monitoring begins
├─ Tier 1: Custom content piece or research shared via BDR
└─ Output: Initial touchpoints, engagement signals collected

WEEK 5-8: ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT
├─ BDR outreach sequences begin (Tier 1: personalized, Tier 2: templated)
├─ Webinar/event invitations sent (Tier 1-2)
├─ Tier 1: Direct mail or gifting for non-responders
├─ Tier 3: Automated nurture activated
├─ Retargeting activated for any account showing web engagement
└─ Output: Meetings booked, engagement scored, tier promotions triggered

WEEK 9-12: CONVERSION & PROGRESSION
├─ BDR follow-up on all engaged contacts
├─ Tier 1: Executive engagement for high-value stalled accounts
├─ Tier promotion/demotion review
├─ Pipeline created from ABM tracked and attributed
└─ Output: SQOs created, pipeline dollars attributed, cohort data collected

Budget Allocation Framework

Budget Category	% of ABM Budget	Rationale
Paid media (LinkedIn + programmatic)	40-50%	The awareness and air cover layer. Necessary for all tiers.
BDR time allocation	20-30%	The conversion engine. BDR time is expensive; protect it for Tier 1-2.
Content and creative	10-15%	Custom assets for Tier 1, persona templates for Tier 2.
Direct mail / gifting	5-10%	Tier 1 only. Pattern interrupt budget.
Tools and platforms	5-10%	ABM platform, intent data, enrichment tools.

---

Phase 6: BDR Coordination

Input: Channel plan with sequencing (Phase 5) Output: BDR playbook with account assignments, outreach sequences, and handoff criteria

The ABM-BDR Operating Model

ABM without BDR coordination is just advertising. The BDR is the conversion mechanism.

Core principle: BDR outreach must be synchronized with marketing air cover. A BDR calling into an account that hasn't seen any marketing touches is cold calling, not ABM.

BDR Account Assignment

Tier	BDR Assignment	Account Load	Outreach Cadence
Tier 1	Named BDR per account (or small group of 5-10)	10-15 accounts per BDR	2-3 touches per contact per week across channels
Tier 2	BDR pool covering a segment	25-40 accounts per BDR	1-2 touches per contact per week, templated
Tier 3	No dedicated BDR. Intent-triggered only.	N/A	BDR engages only when intent signal or engagement threshold triggers an alert

Outreach Sequence Design

Tier 1 sequence (12-touch, 4-week cycle):

Touch	Day	Channel	Content
1	Day 1	LinkedIn connect	Personalized connection request referencing a trigger event
2	Day 2	Email	Insight-led email referencing their specific challenge (not your product)
3	Day 5	LinkedIn engage	Comment on or share their content, or share relevant research
4	Day 7	Email	Case study from their industry/vertical with specific outcomes
5	Day 10	Phone	Call referencing email engagement (only if opens/clicks detected)
6	Day 12	LinkedIn message	Share a custom piece of content relevant to their role
7	Day 15	Email	Direct ask for a conversation with a specific value proposition
8	Day 17	Direct mail	Physical piece (book, handwritten note, branded item)
9	Day 20	Email	Follow up on direct mail, tie to upcoming event or deadline
10	Day 22	LinkedIn voice note	Personal voice message (pattern interrupt)
11	Day 25	Email	Final value-add, no ask (leave the door open)
12	Day 28	Internal review	Score engagement, decide: continue, pause, or escalate to exec

Tier 2 sequence (8-touch, 3-week cycle):

Persona-templated version of the Tier 1 sequence. Same structure, but the personalization is at the persona level (CISO, CTO, Compliance Manager), not the individual level.

BDR-to-Sales Handoff Criteria

Define when an ABM-engaged account transitions from BDR-owned to sales-owned.

Handoff Trigger	What BDR Provides at Handoff
Meeting booked with qualified contact	Account brief: tier, engagement history, personas contacted, content consumed, buying trigger
Champion identified and validated	Champion profile: role, pain points discussed, competitive landscape, timeline indicators
Multiple personas engaged (2+)	Committee map update: who's engaged, who's not, recommended entry strategy for remaining personas
Inbound request from ABM account	Flag as ABM-sourced in CRM. Ensure attribution captures the marketing touches that preceded the inbound.

---

Phase 7: Measurement & Attribution

Input: Active ABM program data (all prior phases) Output: ABM performance dashboard and attribution model

ABM Metrics Framework

ABM metrics are different from demand gen metrics. You're measuring account progression, not lead volume.

Tier 1 metrics (report to leadership):

Metric	Definition	Target Benchmark
Account engagement score	Composite score: web visits + ad clicks + email engagement + BDR responses per account	Tier 1: 70%+ accounts engaged. Tier 2: 50%+. Tier 3: 30%+.
Pipeline created (ABM-sourced)	Pipeline $ from opportunities where an ABM target account created an SQO	Track separately from demand gen pipeline
Pipeline influenced (ABM-influenced)	Pipeline $ from opportunities where ABM touched the account but didn't source the opportunity	Report alongside sourced, but don't conflate them
ABM cost per SQO	Total ABM spend / SQOs created from ABM accounts	Compare against demand gen cost per SQO. Higher is acceptable if ACV justifies it.
ABM CAC payback	ABM cost per SQO / (ACV × gross margin / 12)	Must be < 12 months. Compare against demand gen CAC payback.
Average deal size (ABM vs. non-ABM)	Mean ACV of ABM-sourced deals vs. all other deals	ABM should produce 1.5-3× larger deals. If not, tiering or ICP is off.

Tier 2 metrics (operational, for program optimization):

Metric	Definition	Why It Matters
Account penetration	# of contacts engaged per account / total contacts in buying committee	Shows whether you're reaching the full committee or just one person
Tier progression rate	% of Tier 3 accounts that moved to Tier 2, Tier 2 to Tier 1	Measures whether your warming plays work
Channel contribution to engagement	Which channels drove the most engagement by tier	Informs next cohort's channel allocation
BDR meeting rate (ABM vs. cold)	Meeting booked rate for ABM accounts vs. non-ABM cold outreach	Should be 2-3× higher for ABM. If not, air cover isn't working.
Time to SQO (ABM)	Days from ABM program start to SQO creation	Track by tier. Tier 1 should convert faster than Tier 3.

Attribution Rules for ABM

ABM attribution is account-level, not lead-level. This is the critical difference from demand gen attribution.

Rule	Why It Matters
Attribute at the account level, not the contact level.	In ABM, marketing may engage the CISO, BDR may book a meeting with the CTO, and the deal closes with the VP Engineering. Lead-level attribution misses the full picture.
Define "ABM-sourced" vs. "ABM-influenced" clearly.	Sourced: the account's first meaningful marketing touch was an ABM campaign. Influenced: the account was in your ABM list and received ABM touches, but first contact came from another channel.
Credit the program, not just the last touch.	If LinkedIn ads warmed the account, BDR booked the meeting, and the demo closed the deal, the ABM program gets credit. Don't let last-touch attribution give all credit to the demo.
Track the counterfactual.	Compare ABM accounts' conversion rates against similar non-ABM accounts. The delta is your ABM lift. Without this, you can't prove ABM works.
Separate cohorts in reporting.	Each ABM cohort (Q1, Q2, etc.) should be reported independently. Mixing cohorts hides whether your program is improving over time.

---

Phase 8: Program Review & Feedback Loop

Input: Measurement data (Phase 7) + qualitative feedback from BDR and sales Output: Cohort review document that updates Phase 1 inputs for the next cohort

This is the phase most ABM programs skip. It's also the phase that makes the difference between a one-off campaign and a compounding system.

Quarterly ABM Review Template

ABM PROGRAM REVIEW: COHORT [X], Q[X] [YEAR]

PROGRAM SUMMARY
- Cohort size: [X] accounts ([X] T1, [X] T2, [X] T3)
- Total ABM spend: $[X]
- Duration: [X] weeks

RESULTS
- Accounts engaged: [X]/[X] ([X]%)
- Meetings booked: [X]
- SQOs created: [X] ($[X] pipeline)
- Pipeline influenced: $[X]
- Cost per SQO: $[X]
- Average deal size (ABM): $[X] vs. $[X] (non-ABM)
- CAC payback period: [X] months

WHAT WORKED (evidence required, not opinions)
1. [Specific tactic/channel] → [Measurable result]
2. [Specific tactic/channel] → [Measurable result]

WHAT DIDN'T WORK (be honest)
1. [What failed] → [Why we think it failed] → [What we're changing]
2. [What failed] → [Why we think it failed] → [What we're changing]

ICP UPDATES FOR NEXT COHORT
- Add criteria: [What we learned about who buys]
- Remove criteria: [What we assumed that wasn't true]
- Adjust weighting: [Which scorecard criteria mattered more/less than expected]

TIERING ADJUSTMENTS
- Tier thresholds: [Any changes to scoring cutoffs]
- Resource allocation: [Shift budget between tiers?]

CHANNEL MIX CHANGES
- Increase: [Channels that performed above expectation]
- Decrease: [Channels that underperformed]
- Test: [New channels to try in next cohort]

BDR FEEDBACK
- Sequence effectiveness: [What BDRs report about response rates]
- Messaging: [What resonated vs. what fell flat]
- Handoff quality: [Sales feedback on ABM-sourced meetings]

NEXT COHORT PLAN
- Cohort size target: [X] accounts
- Budget: $[X]
- Key change from this cohort: [The single biggest adjustment]
- Expected SQOs: [X] (based on this cohort's conversion rates, adjusted for changes)

The Compounding Effect

Track these metrics across cohorts to prove the system compounds:

Metric	Cohort 1	Cohort 2	Cohort 3	Trend
Cost per SQO				Should decrease
Account engagement rate				Should increase
BDR meeting rate				Should increase
Average deal size				Should increase or hold
Time to SQO				Should decrease
ICP accuracy (% of selected accounts that engage)				Should increase

If these metrics aren't improving cohort over cohort, the feedback loop isn't working. Diagnose whether the issue is data quality, ICP accuracy, channel mix, or BDR execution.

---

Integration Notes

With Other Skills in This Repo

• Pipeline Attribution Narrator: Use for the attribution model selection in Phase 7. The W-shaped or Full Path models are most appropriate for ABM. The narrator's geo/segment split guidance applies when running ABM across multiple regions.

• GRC Messaging Guardrails: All ABM content referencing compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) must be validated through the guardrails skill. Compliance terminology errors in Tier 1 personalized content are especially damaging because they signal a lack of domain expertise to the exact audience you're trying to impress.

• BDR Enablement Generator (coming): Phase 6 BDR sequences should be generated using the enablement skill once available. This skill provides the strategic framework; the BDR skill produces the actual outreach content.

• Product Context Template: Upload your ICP, approved messaging, and funnel definitions alongside this skill. Phase 1 ICP work will build on your existing product context rather than starting from scratch.

With Your Tech Stack

• HubSpot: Use Company records for account-level tracking. Create a custom property for ABM Tier (1/2/3) and ABM Cohort. Use Workflows to trigger tier promotion alerts. Attribution uses the Deal object, not Contact.

• LinkedIn Campaign Manager: Upload matched audience lists by tier. Create separate campaigns per tier so you can measure channel contribution at the tier level.

• Intent data platforms (Bombora, G2, TrustRadius): Feed intent signals into Phase 2 account selection and Phase 3 tier promotion triggers. Don't use intent data as the sole selection criterion.

• ABM platforms (Demandbase, 6sense, Terminus): These tools can automate parts of Phase 5 (orchestration) and Phase 7 (measurement). This skill provides the strategic layer those tools need to be configured correctly.

---

Common ABM Mistakes

Mistake	What Happens	How to Avoid
Treating ABM as "targeted ads"	You run LinkedIn ads against an account list and call it ABM. No BDR coordination, no multi-channel orchestration.	ABM requires at minimum: paid media + BDR outreach + content. Ads alone are just account-targeted demand gen.
Selecting too many Tier 1 accounts	Resources spread thin, no account gets enough attention to progress.	Max 25 Tier 1 accounts. If your team can't support 1:1 engagement for all of them, you have too many.
No BDR alignment	Marketing warms accounts, BDR doesn't follow up or follows up with generic outreach that ignores the ABM context.	Joint planning session before each cohort. BDR sees the account brief, knows what content the account consumed, and adjusts outreach accordingly.
Mixing acquisition and expansion ABM	Different motions, different metrics, different teams. Mixing them muddies both.	Run separate cohorts. Expansion ABM targets existing customers for upsell. Acquisition ABM targets net-new logos.
Not running the economics first	You launch ABM at $3,667 cost per SQO targeting $7K ACV accounts. The math never worked.	Phase 1 exists for this reason. If CAC payback exceeds 12 months, either raise the ACV target or don't do ABM.
Reporting account engagement as pipeline	Leadership thinks ABM is "working" because engagement scores are high, but no SQOs were created.	Engagement is an operational metric. Report pipeline and revenue to leadership. Use engagement internally to optimize the program.
Skipping the feedback loop	Each cohort starts from scratch. No compounding.	Phase 8 is non-negotiable. Block 2-3 hours at the end of each cohort to complete the review template.

---

Validation Checklist

Run this before launching any ABM cohort.

Program Design

• ABM economic viability test completed and viable
• ICP for ABM defined (not reusing demand gen ICP verbatim)
• Account list sourced from 3+ channels and cross-referenced
• Every account scored against the qualification scorecard
• Accounts tiered with clear criteria and resource allocation defined
• Tier promotion and demotion rules documented

Buying Committee

• Tier 1 accounts have named contacts (minimum 3 per account)
• Tier 2 accounts have persona-level mapping
• Key personas identified: economic buyer, technical evaluator, champion, user
• Content mapped to each persona's priorities

Execution Readiness

• Channel plan defined per tier with budget allocation
• Orchestration sequencing documented (not everything launching at once)
• BDR account assignments confirmed
• BDR outreach sequences built and reviewed
• Handoff criteria agreed with sales
• CRM fields configured: ABM tier, ABM cohort, ABM-sourced flag

Measurement

• ABM-sourced vs. ABM-influenced definitions documented
• Attribution at account level, not contact level
• Baseline metrics captured (pre-ABM conversion rates for comparison)
• Reporting cadence agreed (weekly operational, monthly strategic, quarterly review)
• Phase 8 review date blocked on calendar before cohort launches

---

Changelog

• v1.0 (March 2026): Initial release. 8-phase sequential pipeline, economic viability model, tiering framework, channel orchestration, BDR coordination, measurement framework, closed-loop review template.