> strategic-compact
Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/affaan-m/everything-claude-code/strategic-compact?format=md"Strategic Compact Skill
Suggests manual /compact at strategic points in your workflow rather than relying on arbitrary auto-compaction.
When to Activate
- Running long sessions that approach context limits (200K+ tokens)
- Working on multi-phase tasks (research → plan → implement → test)
- Switching between unrelated tasks within the same session
- After completing a major milestone and starting new work
- When responses slow down or become less coherent (context pressure)
Why Strategic Compaction?
Auto-compaction triggers at arbitrary points:
- Often mid-task, losing important context
- No awareness of logical task boundaries
- Can interrupt complex multi-step operations
Strategic compaction at logical boundaries:
- After exploration, before execution — Compact research context, keep implementation plan
- After completing a milestone — Fresh start for next phase
- Before major context shifts — Clear exploration context before different task
How It Works
The suggest-compact.js script runs on PreToolUse (Edit/Write) and:
- Tracks tool calls — Counts tool invocations in session
- Threshold detection — Suggests at configurable threshold (default: 50 calls)
- Periodic reminders — Reminds every 25 calls after threshold
Hook Setup
Add to your ~/.claude/settings.json:
{
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Edit",
"hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "node ~/.claude/skills/strategic-compact/suggest-compact.js" }]
},
{
"matcher": "Write",
"hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "node ~/.claude/skills/strategic-compact/suggest-compact.js" }]
}
]
}
}
Configuration
Environment variables:
COMPACT_THRESHOLD— Tool calls before first suggestion (default: 50)
Compaction Decision Guide
Use this table to decide when to compact:
| Phase Transition | Compact? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Research → Planning | Yes | Research context is bulky; plan is the distilled output |
| Planning → Implementation | Yes | Plan is in TodoWrite or a file; free up context for code |
| Implementation → Testing | Maybe | Keep if tests reference recent code; compact if switching focus |
| Debugging → Next feature | Yes | Debug traces pollute context for unrelated work |
| Mid-implementation | No | Losing variable names, file paths, and partial state is costly |
| After a failed approach | Yes | Clear the dead-end reasoning before trying a new approach |
What Survives Compaction
Understanding what persists helps you compact with confidence:
| Persists | Lost |
|---|---|
| CLAUDE.md instructions | Intermediate reasoning and analysis |
| TodoWrite task list | File contents you previously read |
Memory files (~/.claude/memory/) | Multi-step conversation context |
| Git state (commits, branches) | Tool call history and counts |
| Files on disk | Nuanced user preferences stated verbally |
Best Practices
- Compact after planning — Once plan is finalized in TodoWrite, compact to start fresh
- Compact after debugging — Clear error-resolution context before continuing
- Don't compact mid-implementation — Preserve context for related changes
- Read the suggestion — The hook tells you when, you decide if
- Write before compacting — Save important context to files or memory before compacting
- Use
/compactwith a summary — Add a custom message:/compact Focus on implementing auth middleware next
Related
- The Longform Guide — Token optimization section
- Memory persistence hooks — For state that survives compaction
continuous-learningskill — Extracts patterns before session ends
> related_skills --same-repo
> skill-comply
Visualize whether skills, rules, and agent definitions are actually followed — auto-generates scenarios at 3 prompt strictness levels, runs agents, classifies behavioral sequences, and reports compliance rates with full tool call timelines
> santa-method
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.
> safety-guard
# Safety Guard — Prevent Destructive Operations ## When to Use - When working on production systems - When agents are running autonomously (full-auto mode) - When you want to restrict edits to a specific directory - During sensitive operations (migrations, deploys, data changes) ## How It Works Three modes of protection: ### Mode 1: Careful Mode Intercepts destructive commands before execution and warns: ``` Watched patterns: - rm -rf (especially /, ~, or project root) - git push --force
> product-lens
# Product Lens — Think Before You Build ## When to Use - Before starting any feature — validate the "why" - Weekly product review — are we building the right thing? - When stuck choosing between features - Before a launch — sanity check the user journey - When converting a vague idea into a spec ## How It Works ### Mode 1: Product Diagnostic Like YC office hours but automated. Asks the hard questions: ``` 1. Who is this for? (specific person, not "developers") 2. What's the pain? (quantify