> agenthub
Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/agenthub?format=md"AgentHub — Multi-Agent Collaboration
Spawn N parallel AI agents that compete on the same task. Each agent works in an isolated git worktree. The coordinator evaluates results and merges the winner.
Slash Commands
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
/hub:init | Create a new collaboration session — task, agent count, eval criteria |
/hub:spawn | Launch N parallel subagents in isolated worktrees |
/hub:status | Show DAG state, agent progress, branch status |
/hub:eval | Rank agent results by metric or LLM judge |
/hub:merge | Merge winning branch, archive losers |
/hub:board | Read/write the agent message board |
/hub:run | One-shot lifecycle: init → baseline → spawn → eval → merge |
Agent Templates
When spawning with --template, agents follow a predefined iteration pattern:
| Template | Pattern | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
optimizer | Edit → eval → keep/discard → repeat x10 | Performance, latency, size |
refactorer | Restructure → test → iterate until green | Code quality, tech debt |
test-writer | Write tests → measure coverage → repeat | Test coverage gaps |
bug-fixer | Reproduce → diagnose → fix → verify | Bug fix approaches |
Templates are defined in references/agent-templates.md.
When This Skill Activates
Trigger phrases:
- "try multiple approaches"
- "have agents compete"
- "parallel optimization"
- "spawn N agents"
- "compare different solutions"
- "fan-out" or "tournament"
- "generate content variations"
- "compare different drafts"
- "A/B test copy"
- "explore multiple strategies"
Coordinator Protocol
The main Claude Code session is the coordinator. It follows this lifecycle:
INIT → DISPATCH → MONITOR → EVALUATE → MERGE
1. Init
Run /hub:init to create a session. This generates:
.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yaml— task config.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/state.json— state machine.agenthub/board/— message board channels
2. Dispatch
Run /hub:spawn to launch agents. For each agent 1..N:
- Post task assignment to
.agenthub/board/dispatch/ - Spawn via Agent tool with
isolation: "worktree" - All agents launched in a single message (parallel)
3. Monitor
Run /hub:status to check progress:
dag_analyzer.py --status --session {id}shows branch state- Board
progress/channel has agent updates
4. Evaluate
Run /hub:eval to rank results:
- Metric mode: run eval command in each worktree, parse numeric result
- Judge mode: read diffs, coordinator ranks by quality
- Hybrid: metric first, LLM-judge for ties
5. Merge
Run /hub:merge to finalize:
git merge --no-ffwinner into base branch- Tag losers:
git tag hub/archive/{session}/agent-{i} - Clean up worktrees
- Post merge summary to board
Agent Protocol
Each subagent receives this prompt pattern:
You are agent-{i} in hub session {session-id}.
Your task: {task description}
Instructions:
1. Read your assignment at .agenthub/board/dispatch/{seq}-agent-{i}.md
2. Work in your worktree — make changes, run tests, iterate
3. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
4. Write your result summary to .agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md
5. Exit when done
Agents do NOT see each other's work. They do NOT communicate with each other. They only write to the board for the coordinator to read.
DAG Model
Branch Naming
hub/{session-id}/agent-{N}/attempt-{M}
- Session ID: timestamp-based (
YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS) - Agent N: sequential (1 to agent-count)
- Attempt M: increments on retry (usually 1)
Frontier Detection
Frontier = branch tips with no child branches. Equivalent to AgentHub's "leaves" query.
python scripts/dag_analyzer.py --frontier --session {id}
Immutability
The DAG is append-only:
- Never rebase or force-push agent branches
- Never delete commits (only branch refs after archival)
- Every approach preserved via git tags
Message Board
Location: .agenthub/board/
Channels
| Channel | Writer | Reader | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
dispatch/ | Coordinator | Agents | Task assignments |
progress/ | Agents | Coordinator | Status updates |
results/ | Agents + Coordinator | All | Final results + merge summary |
Post Format
---
author: agent-1
timestamp: 2026-03-17T14:30:22Z
channel: results
parent: null
---
## Result Summary
- **Approach**: Replaced O(n²) sort with hash map
- **Files changed**: 3
- **Metric**: 142ms (baseline: 180ms, delta: -38ms)
- **Confidence**: High — all tests pass
Board Rules
- Append-only: never edit or delete posts
- Unique filenames:
{seq:03d}-{author}-{timestamp}.md - YAML frontmatter required on all posts
Evaluation Modes
Metric-Based
Best for: benchmarks, test pass rates, file sizes, response times.
python scripts/result_ranker.py --session {id} \
--eval-cmd "pytest bench.py --json" \
--metric p50_ms --direction lower
The ranker runs the eval command in each agent's worktree directory and parses the metric from stdout.
LLM Judge
Best for: code quality, readability, architecture decisions.
The coordinator reads each agent's diff (git diff base...agent-branch) and ranks by:
- Correctness (does it solve the task?)
- Simplicity (fewer lines changed preferred)
- Quality (clean execution, good structure)
Hybrid
Run metric first. If top agents are within 10% of each other, use LLM judge to break ties.
Session Lifecycle
init → running → evaluating → merged
→ archived (if no winner)
State transitions managed by session_manager.py:
| From | To | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
init | running | /hub:spawn completes |
running | evaluating | All agents return |
evaluating | merged | /hub:merge completes |
evaluating | archived | No winner / all failed |
Proactive Triggers
The coordinator should act when:
| Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| All agents crashed | Post failure summary, suggest retry with different constraints |
| No improvement over baseline | Archive session, suggest different approaches |
| Orphan worktrees detected | Run session_manager.py --cleanup {id} |
Session stuck in running | Check board for progress, consider timeout |
Installation
# Copy to your Claude Code skills directory
cp -r engineering/agenthub ~/.claude/skills/agenthub
# Or install via ClawHub
clawhub install agenthub
Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
hub_init.py | Initialize .agenthub/ structure and session |
dag_analyzer.py | Frontier detection, DAG graph, branch status |
board_manager.py | Message board CRUD (channels, posts, threads) |
result_ranker.py | Rank agents by metric or diff quality |
session_manager.py | Session state machine and cleanup |
Related Skills
- autoresearch-agent — Single-agent optimization loop (use AgentHub when you want N agents competing)
- self-improving-agent — Self-modifying agent (use AgentHub when you want external competition)
- git-worktree-manager — Git worktree utilities (AgentHub uses worktrees internally)
> related_skills --same-repo
> quality-manager-qmr
Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.
> qms-audit-expert
ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.
> mdr-745-specialist
EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Covers Annex VIII classification rules, Annex II/III technical files, Annex XIV clinical evaluation, and EUDAMED integration.
> isms-audit-expert
Information Security Management System (ISMS) audit expert for ISO 27001 compliance verification, security control assessment, and certification support. Use when the user mentions ISO 27001, ISMS audit, Annex A controls, Statement of Applicability (SOA), gap analysis, nonconformity management, internal audit, surveillance audit, or security certification preparation. Helps review control implementation evidence, document audit findings, classify nonconformities, generate risk-based audit plans,