> rr
코드 리뷰. 작업 후 변경사항을 Z.AI 모델로 검토하고, Codex가 결과를 다시 검증해 유효한 이슈만 정리한다. /rr 또는 'GLM 리뷰' 요청 시 사용.
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/dgk-dev/dgk-gpt/rr?format=md"/rr
Use glm-review as a second reviewer for the current change set, then validate the reported issues against the actual code before you trust or repeat them.
Default Flow
- Determine the exact change scope first.
- If the user points to a commit, prefer commit mode.
- If the user says
staged, use staged mode. - If the user says
pr, use PR mode. - If the workspace has mixed unrelated changes, build a focused diff file for only the intended files.
- Run a quick connectivity check only when the environment looks suspect:
glm-review --health
- Run the review with the narrowest correct input:
glm-review
glm-review --mode staged
glm-review --mode pr
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH>
glm-review --diff-file /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch
- Treat the output as a candidate issue list, not ground truth.
- Re-open the referenced code and verify each claim.
- Report only valid issues, ordered by severity.
- If fixing issues is in scope, fix them and rerun the closest relevant verification.
Choosing Review Input
Prefer the most specific path that isolates the current task:
- committed single change:
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH>
- committed subset of files:
glm-review --mode commit --ref <COMMIT_HASH> --files src/a.ts src/b.ts
- custom focused diff for multi-session or mixed worktrees:
GIT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$GIT_ROOT" && git diff HEAD -- <file1> <file2> ... > /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch
glm-review --diff-file /tmp/glm-review-diff.patch
If the diff is empty, stop and say there is nothing to review.
Validation Rules
- Do not parrot
glm-reviewoutput without checking the code. - Drop false positives explicitly instead of forwarding them.
- Distinguish between confirmed bugs, arguable style comments, and already-fixed issues.
- If the review claims a regression, inspect the relevant file and the actual diff before accepting it.
Error Handling
Common fixes:
command not found: glm-reviewInstall it withnpm install -g glm-reviewZAI_API_KEY not setExportZAI_API_KEYin the shell or your normal secret-loading path before rerunning401or auth failure Re-runglm-review --healthafter refreshing credentials
Finish
Return:
- review scope used
- confirmed findings only
- what was rejected as false positive, if anything material
- what verification ran after fixes, if any
> related_skills --same-repo
> test
Persistent verification mode. Use when the user explicitly says `/test` or clearly wants exhaustive test, QA, and fix loops before signoff, especially when they want you to keep grinding while they are away. Bias Codex toward running the relevant existing test stack, browser or desktop verification, and diagnosis repeatedly until the requested surface is verified or a real blocker remains.
> rrr
GLM-5 코드 리뷰. /rr의 상위 버전으로 더 강한 모델로 변경사항을 검토하고, Codex가 결과를 다시 검증해 유효한 이슈만 정리한다.
> re
Explicit extra-research mode. Use only when the user says `/re` or clearly asks for a research-heavy pass before coding. This skill should bias Codex toward more source-checking and justification without replacing its normal orchestration.
> ralph
Persistent completion mode. Use when the user explicitly says `/ralph` or clearly wants you to keep iterating until the task is actually finished, repeating implement-verify-fix loops instead of stopping at partial progress.