> startup-competitive-analysis
Competitive analysis for startups: identify and segment competitors (direct/indirect/substitutes/status quo), map markets, build sales battlecards, run win/loss + churn analyses, and refine positioning/differentiation. Use when asked to compare products vs competitors, define competitive alternatives, explain category structure, or set up competitive intelligence monitoring and update cadences.
curl "https://skillshub.wtf/luisschmitzheadline/VC-Skills.md/vasilyu-startup-competitive-analysis?format=md"Startup Competitive Analysis
Use this skill to produce decision-oriented competitive intelligence: define the competitive set, collect evidence, synthesize match / ignore / bet decisions, and ship practical artifacts teams can use (briefs, landscapes, battlecards, win/loss).
Operating Principles (2026)
- Prefer decisions over inventories: make explicit
match / ignore / betcalls with rationale and owner. - Treat competitor claims as hypotheses: validate with buyer reality and current evidence.
- Date-stamp key claims and keep an evidence trail (link + capture month).
- Triangulate important facts across sources (at least two).
- Stay ethical: respect ToS; don’t scrape behind auth/paywalls; don’t misrepresent identity.
Intake Checklist (Ask First)
- Objective: sales enablement, positioning, strategy, fundraising, churn reduction
- Market: category, geography, segment (ICP), and time horizon (now vs 6–12 months)
- Known competitors and “do nothing” alternative (status quo / DIY / services)
- Constraints: available sources, web access, internal docs, legal/compliance requirements
Choose the Right Output
| If the user asks… | Produce… | Use… |
|---|---|---|
| “Who are the competitors?” / “Map the landscape” | Market map + competitor set | references/market-mapping-guide.md, assets/competitive-landscape.md |
| “How do we differentiate?” / “What category are we in?” | Category structure + differentiation thesis | references/industry-structure-and-differentiation.md, assets/competitive-analysis-brief.md |
| “How should we position?” | Positioning canvas + statement + tests | references/positioning-playbook.md, assets/competitive-analysis-brief.md |
| “Deep dive Competitor X” | Deep dive + (optional) battlecard | references/competitor-deep-dive.md, assets/battlecard.md |
| “Why are we losing to X?” / “What’s driving churn?” | Win/loss + churn patterns + remediation | assets/win-loss-analysis.md |
Workflow
- Define the competitive set: direct/indirect/substitutes/status quo, segmented by ICP and job-to-be-done.
- Collect evidence: product/docs/pricing, changelogs, job postings, reviews/VoC, partnerships, distribution signals.
- Analyze on buyer criteria: switching costs, time-to-value, risk/procurement, integration ecosystem, ROI proof.
- Synthesize into decisions:
match/ignore/bet, wedge, proof points, landmines, and “walk-away” criteria. - Produce artifacts: narrative brief, landscape, battlecards, win/loss summary (use bundled templates).
- Operationalize: set an update cadence and monitoring sources; refresh battlecards and decisions as signals change.
Evidence & Freshness Rules
- Prefer primary sources first (docs, pricing pages, release notes, filings), then triangulate.
- Use dated evidence labels like
[YYYY-MM]and include the source URL. - If web search is available, verify “current state” (pricing, positioning, major launches, funding, M&A). If not, state the limitation and proceed with provided context.
Lightweight CI Monitoring (No Tool Assumptions)
- Seed sources from
data/sources.json; add category-specific sources for the market. - Track changes to: pricing pages, docs/changelogs, security/compliance pages, partner directories, job postings, ad libraries, review sites.
- Keep a simple change log and review it on a fixed cadence (weekly/monthly/quarterly based on sales cycle).
Resources
| Resource | Purpose |
|---|---|
| competitor-deep-dive.md | Full competitor analysis framework |
| market-mapping-guide.md | Market map creation |
| positioning-playbook.md | Positioning methodology |
| industry-structure-and-differentiation.md | Porter 5 Forces + JTBD alternatives + strategy canvas |
Templates
| Template | Purpose |
|---|---|
| competitive-analysis-brief.md | Decision-oriented narrative brief |
| competitive-landscape.md | Full competitive overview |
| battlecard.md | Sales enablement |
| win-loss-analysis.md | Deal analysis |
Data
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| sources.json | Competitive intelligence sources |
> related_skills --same-repo
> roadmap-management
Plan and prioritize product roadmaps using frameworks like RICE, MoSCoW, and ICE. Use when creating a roadmap, reprioritizing features, mapping dependencies, choosing between Now/Next/Later or quarterly formats, or presenting roadmap tradeoffs to stakeholders.
> progress-reporting
Structure project, sprint, or initiative progress reports. Use when writing progress reports that pull from work, comms, data, and research — what to include (shipped, in progress, blocked, risks, team), format by audience.
> metrics-tracking
Define, track, and analyze product metrics with frameworks for goal setting and dashboard design. Use when setting up OKRs, building metrics dashboards, running weekly metrics reviews, identifying trends, or choosing the right metrics for a product area.
> prepare-quarterly-business-review
Quarterly business review agenda, metrics, narrative, and follow-up templates for customer business reviews. Use when preparing a quarterly business review, building an agenda, or pulling context from CRM, knowledge base, or chat.